Polity

The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) is facing nationwide criticism after rolling out On-Screen Marking (OSM) — a fully digital answer-sheet evaluation system — for Class 12 board exams for the first time in 2026, amid complaints of low marks, blurred scans, and a crashing re-evaluation portal. This article explains what OSM is, how digital evaluation works, why CBSE adopted it, what went wrong in the rollout, the constitutional and governance questions it raises, and the wider e-governance lessons for India's examination system.

The Supreme Court of India, on 29 May 2026, invoked its extraordinary powers under Article 142 to issue binding, nationwide guidelines directing all High Courts to pronounce reserved judgments within three months, decide bail matters the same or next day, and upload verdicts within 24 hours. Linking judicial delay to a violation of the right to personal liberty under Article 21, the Court created an enforceable accountability framework. This article explains reserved judgments, the Article 142 power, the right to a speedy trial, landmark precedents like Anil Rai and Hussainara Khatoon, and the pendency crisis — everything a UPSC aspirant needs in one place.

On 28 May 2026, the Supreme Court of India upheld the constitutional validity of the retrospective levy of 28% Goods and Services Tax (GST) on online money gaming, fantasy sports and casinos, reviving tax demands worth nearly ₹2.5 lakh crore against companies like Dream11, Gameskraft and Delta Corp. The Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan held that any game involving staking of money on uncertain outcomes amounts to "betting and gambling" for GST purposes, irrespective of whether skill or chance dominates. This article explains the verdict, the constitutional and statutory framework under Articles 246A and 366, the meaning of "actionable claims," the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming (PROG) Act 2025, the long-standing skill versus chance jurisprudence, and the wider economic and federal implications for India's gaming sector.

On 27 May 2026, the Supreme Court upheld the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls as constitutionally valid under Article 324, but ruled that the EC's citizenship scrutiny cannot be the final word — doubtful cases must go to the competent authority under the Citizenship Act, 1955. This article explains the SIR exercise, the constitutional basis under Articles 324–326, the Representation of the People Act 1950, the distinction between electoral eligibility and citizenship, the proportionality test, key data on deleted voters, and the safeguards mandated by the Court — covering everything UPSC aspirants need on this landmark verdict.

Women's representation in India's Lok Sabha and state assemblies has rarely crossed half of the 33% mark, with the current share in Lok Sabha at around 14.4% and even lower in most Vidhan Sabhas. Despite the passage of the Women's Reservation Act in 2023 providing one-third quota, the reservation is not yet operational because it is linked to the delimitation exercise after the next Census. This article explains the constitutional framework for women's representation, current data, the 2023 Act provisions, the technical role of delimitation, global comparison and all basic concepts from the UPSC point of view.

The Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026 failed to pass in the Lok Sabha because it did not receive the special majority required under Article 368 of the Constitution. The bill sought to enable fresh delimitation, increase Lok Sabha strength to 850 seats and operationalise one-third women’s reservation. This article explains the constitutional amendment procedure, special majority requirement, technical provisions of the bill, delimitation framework and all basic constitutional concepts behind why such a bill can fail in Parliament.

The government will introduce a 'schedule' in Parliament that clearly lists the exact new number of Lok Sabha seats for every state while keeping each state's current percentage share in the total strength unchanged. This move uses the 2011 Census for delimitation, increases overall Lok Sabha seats by about 50 per cent to around 850, and protects South India's representation. The article explains what the schedule means, how delimitation works, the pro-rata formula for seats, impact on North-South balance, women's quota rollout and all basic technical concepts behind the three constitutional amendment bills.

The government has circulated three Constitutional Amendment Bills to enable fresh delimitation based on the 2011 Census, raise Lok Sabha strength from 543 to 850 seats, and operationalise one-third reservation for women in Parliament and state assemblies. These bills aim to implement the long-pending women's quota early while ending mandatory delimitation after every Census. This article explains the key provisions of the bills, the constitutional process of amendment, what delimitation means, how the 2011 Census will be used, the impact on North-South balance.

With just one day left for the voter list to be finalised for the first phase of the West Bengal Assembly elections (scheduled for April 23, 2026), the appellate tribunals set up to hear appeals of “deleted” voters held their first and only hearing so far. Following a Supreme Court order, the tribunal quickly restored the name of Motab Shaikh, the Congress candidate from Farakka in Murshidabad district, who had been removed from the voter list during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. Most other tribunals are yet to start functioning fully, raising concerns about lakhs of voters still waiting for a final decision before the nomination deadline ends on April 6.

On March 27, 2026, the government introduced the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2026 in the Lok Sabha. The bill seeks to amend 79 central acts administered by 23 ministries and proposes to decriminalise 717 minor procedural offences while removing or changing 67 more provisions. This is the second edition of the Jan Vishwas initiative after the 2023 Act. Congress members raised strong objections during introduction, but the government rejected them, saying there is no precedent for sending such bills to a parliamentary committee at this stage.

On March 11, 2026, the Supreme Court directed the Centre, states, Union Territories, universities, and public institutions receiving government funds to immediately disassociate three experts—Professor Michel Danino (chairperson of the NCERT social science curriculum committee), Suparna Diwakar, and Alok Prasanna Kumar—from any role in preparing school curriculum or finalising textbooks using public funds. This came after a suo motu case over a withdrawn Class 8 Social Science textbook chapter discussing "corruption in the judiciary," which the court called an attempt to demean the institution and harmful to impressionable students. The court also ordered formation of an expert committee to review legal studies content and barred publication of any rewritten chapter without domain expert approval.

The Supreme Court on March 11, 2026, dismissed the Centre's appeals against judgments from three High Courts—Delhi, Madras, and Kerala—ruling that creamy layer status for Other Backward Classes (OBC) reservations cannot be based only on parental income. This decision came in cases involving UPSC civil services candidates whose parents work in public sector undertakings (PSUs) or private firms, emphasizing that social status and job equivalence must also be considered to avoid unfair treatment among similar OBC groups.