US President Donald Trump's 20-point Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict, released on September 29, 2025, has gained traction with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's endorsement and Hamas's conditional acceptance for releasing hostages and ceding governance. Amid indirect talks in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, facilitated by Qatari and Egyptian mediators, the plan proposes an International Stabilization Force (ISF) for Gaza's security and reconstruction. However, discrepancies over Israeli withdrawal, Hamas disarmament, and the force's composition highlight implementation hurdles, drawing global attention as it coincides with the second anniversary of the October 7, 2023, attack that killed nearly 1,200 Israelis and led to over 67,000 Palestinian deaths. This development is crucial for India's interests in West Asian stability, affecting energy security, diaspora welfare, and projects like the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC).
What Is the Background of the Israel-Hamas Conflict Leading to Trump's 2025 Gaza Plan?
Historical Context: The conflict traces back to the 1948 establishment of Israel, displacing Palestinians in what they call the Nakba, leading to ongoing disputes over land, borders, and self-determination; Gaza, a 365 sq km strip home to over 2 million Palestinians, has been under Israeli blockade since 2007 when Hamas took control, exacerbating humanitarian crises with limited access to essentials like water and electricity.
Recent Escalation: The October 7, 2023, Hamas attack killed nearly 1,200 Israelis and took over 250 hostages, prompting Israel's military response that has caused over 67,000 Palestinian deaths, widespread destruction, and famine-like conditions in Gaza, described by a UN commission as potential genocide.
Diplomatic Efforts: Previous US-led initiatives like the 2020 Abraham Accords normalized Israel-Arab ties but sidelined Palestinians; Trump's plan builds on these, aiming to manage the conflict for broader alliances, including potential Israel-Saudi normalization, amid global calls for a two-state solution.
Indian Perspective: India maintains balanced ties with Israel (defense partnerships) and Palestinians (historical support via Non-Aligned Movement), viewing the plan as a potential stabilizer for regional projects like IMEC but wary of escalations impacting its 9 million diaspora and energy imports from the Gulf.
What Is Trump's 20-Point Comprehensive Plan for Gaza, and What Are Its Key Components?
Overall Structure: Released on September 29, 2025, the plan has two parts—an immediate ceasefire with exchanges and a long-term vision for a deradicalized, prosperous Gaza; it aims to end hostilities, rebuild infrastructure, and create security without Hamas governance.
Immediate Ceasefire and Exchanges: Points 3-6 outline war cessation upon agreement, with Israeli forces withdrawing to prepare for hostage release (all hostages returned within 72 hours), Israel releasing 250 life-sentence prisoners and 1,700 post-October 7 detainees, plus remains exchanges; Hamas members committing to peace get amnesty and safe passage.
Humanitarian Aid and Distribution: Points 7-8 mandate full aid influx matching January 2025 benchmarks (e.g., 600 trucks daily), including infrastructure rehab (water, electricity, hospitals, rubble clearance), distributed interference-free via UN, Red Crescent, and neutrals; Rafah crossing reopens under prior mechanisms.
Transitional Governance: Point 9 establishes a technocratic Palestinian committee for daily services, overseen by Trump's "Board of Peace" (including Tony Blair) until PA reforms; Point 13 excludes Hamas from governance, mandates destruction of military infrastructure like tunnels.
Economic Redevelopment: Points 10-12 and 19-20 involve a Trump-led economic plan with experts for job creation, a special economic zone with tariffs, encouraging Gazans to stay (no forced displacement, free movement), and eventual PA reform for Palestinian statehood pathway via US-mediated dialogue.
Security and Demilitarization: Points 1-2, 13-14, and 16-17 focus on Gaza as a terror-free zone, demilitarization under monitors with weapon buybacks, regional guarantees for compliance, and partial implementation in terror-free areas if Hamas delays.
Interfaith and Long-Term Peace: Point 18 sets up dialogue for tolerance; Point 19 links redevelopment to self-determination aspirations.
What Is the Role of the International Stabilization Force (ISF) in Trump's Plan?
Core Functions: As per Point 15, the US-led ISF deploys immediately to train vetted Palestinian police, consult Jordan/Egypt for expertise, secure borders, prevent munitions entry, and facilitate goods flow for rebuilding; it acts as the long-term internal security solution.
Relation to Withdrawal: Point 16 states Israel won't occupy/annex Gaza; IDF withdraws progressively based on demilitarization milestones, handing territory to ISF, retaining a temporary security perimeter until threats subside.
Deconfliction Mechanism: A agreed-upon system to avoid clashes between ISF, IDF, and others, ensuring smooth handover.
Potential Composition: Involves Arab/international partners, but no specifics; Arab states hesitant without UN mandate, focusing on training rather than direct combat roles.
Why Will Trump's Proposed Stabilization Force in Gaza Not Find Things Easy?
Lack of UN Mandate and Legitimacy: Unlike traditional peacekeeping (e.g., UNIFIL in Lebanon), the ISF lacks UNSC authorization under Chapter VII for force use or neutrality, aligning it with US-Israeli objectives and risking perceptions as occupation enablers.
Absence of Political Resolution: Deployment amid incomplete Israeli withdrawal (retaining buffers in Rafah, Khan Yunis) and Hamas non-commitment to full disarmament could spark resistance from splinter groups, leading to combat risks as seen in failed missions like NATO's ISAF in Afghanistan (2003-2021).
Historical Precedents of Failure: Similar non-UN forces, like the 1982 Multinational Force in Lebanon, withdrew amid militia fighting; Arab states avoid direct involvement to prevent quagmires, with joint statements demanding full Israeli exit differing from Trump's plan.
Operational and Accountability Gaps: No timelines for formation/deployment, vague deconfliction, and oversight by Trump-led Board raise bias concerns; combat risks increase without full resolution, exponentially raising costs for participants.
Regional and Internal Opposition: Israel's historical distrust of UN troops, Netanyahu's rejection of complete withdrawal for political survival, and Hamas splits (political vs. military wings) complicate enforcement; global support stems from urgency to end war, not alignment with details.
Broader Geopolitical Challenges: Vague statehood pathway seen as illusory, potentially prolonging transitional chaos; for India, implementation hurdles could escalate tensions, impacting Chabahar vs. IMEC rivalries amid Trump's Iran pressures.
What Are the Broader Implications and Criticisms of Trump's Gaza Plan?
Criticisms: Viewed as biased toward Israel (e.g., partial withdrawal, Hamas exclusion without guarantees), illusory statehood (no timelines, conditional on reforms), and a "peace mirage" per experts; Hamas sees it as surrender, while Israeli far-right calls it failure.
Implications for Peace: Success could normalize Israel-Saudi ties, reduce regional threats, but failure perpetuates violence cycles; interfaith dialogue (Point 18) aims to shift narratives, but lacks enforcement.
Global and Indian Angles: Eight Arab nations welcome but insist on full withdrawal; India benefits from stability for energy/diaspora but risks from US-Iran tensions affecting investments; plan extends Abraham Accords, sidelining Palestinians potentially.
Future Directions: Talks in Sharm el-Sheikh focus on exchanges/ceasefire; partial implementation possible in safe areas, but ideological divides may derail, emphasizing need for multilateral approaches like UN involvement.
© 2025 Gaining Sun. All rights reserved.