US President Donald Trump recently moderated his threats of imposing 100% tariffs on Chinese goods after a sharp drop in American stock markets, while China firmly stated it would not back down and would fight to protect its interests. This development, following China's new controls on rare earth exports, exposes the limits of using tariffs to fix trade imbalances and provides important hints for India, which is dealing with US tariffs up to 50% on its goods and additional penalties for importing Russian oil, pushing New Delhi toward reforms and stronger ties with Asian economies.
What is the Recent Escalation in US-China Trade Tensions?
Background of Trade War: The US-China trade war began in 2018 under Trump, with tariffs aimed at reducing US trade deficits; by 2025, a "Phase One" deal capped US tariffs at 30% on Chinese goods and China's at 10% on US products, but recent events show deals can unravel quickly.
Trump's Tariff Threat: On October 10, 2025, Trump announced 100% tariffs on all Chinese imports starting November 1, pushing overall rates to about 130%, in retaliation to China's October 9 export controls on rare earths, which are essential for tech and defense.
Market Reaction and Moderation: US stocks dropped sharply, prompting Trump to soften his stance on October 12, stating he wants to help China avoid economic depression, highlighting how domestic pressures can limit aggressive tariff strategies.
China's Firm Response: Beijing declared it would "fight to the end" if needed, with officials emphasizing that export controls on rare earths (where China holds 70% global refining capacity) are legitimate to protect national security, showing preparedness for prolonged conflict.
What are Tariffs and How Do They Aim to Correct Trade Imbalances?
Definition of Tariffs: Tariffs are taxes on imported goods to make them costlier, protecting domestic industries and reducing imports; they can be reciprocal (matching another's rates) or punitive (higher to punish).
Purpose in US Strategy: The US uses tariffs to address trade deficits, where imports exceed exports; for example, Trump imposed them on China and India to force fairer trade, but a WTO report explains imbalances are natural, arising from specialization—like India's goods surplus with the US offset by US services surplus.
Limitations as Per WTO: Tariffs indirectly affect balances through uncertainty or import rushes but don't fix root causes like savings-investment gaps; macroeconomic factors (fiscal policy, demographics) play a bigger role, making tariffs less effective long-term.
Economic Impacts: They raise costs for consumers and businesses, disrupt supply chains, and can lead to retaliation; in the US-China case, they've reduced bilateral trade but boosted China's exports to ASEAN by diversifying.
What are Rare Earths and Why are They Central to This Dispute?
What are Rare Earth Elements: Rare earths are 17 minerals like neodymium and dysprosium, crucial for electronics, EVs, renewables, and defense (e.g., magnets in fighter jets); they're not rare but hard to extract cleanly.
China's Dominance: China controls over 70% of global refining, giving it leverage; its new rules require approval for exports with >0.1% Chinese rare earths or tech, seen as strategic rather than just retaliatory.
Global Implications: The US is stockpiling $1 billion in critical minerals via the Pentagon to counter this; for India, import-dependent on these for EVs and renewables (target: 500 GW by 2030), it risks supply disruptions.
India's Response: Launched National Critical Minerals Mission in 2024 with Rs 34,300 crore till 2030-31 for exploration (1,200 projects), overseas acquisitions (e.g., lithium in Africa), and recycling (40 kilo tonnes annually from e-waste).
How Has the US-China Dispute Affected India-US Trade Relations?
US Tariffs on India: Since August 2025, US imposed 50% tariffs on Indian goods (25% reciprocal + 25% for Russian oil imports), despite Trump's praise for PM Modi, leading to postponed bilateral talks originally set for August.
India's Trade Position: India has a goods surplus with the US but overall balanced by services deficit; WTO notes this is normal, yet US penalizes India for Russian oil (key for energy security amid Ukraine war).
Recent Efforts: Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal met US Trade Representative in September 2025 to thaw ties, but no new talks scheduled; NITI Aayog suggests GST reforms and Asian focus to counter pressures.
Broader Shifts: India restarted direct flights with China after five years and is considering Chinese investments, dialing down tensions for economic stability.
What Lessons Can India Draw from China's Approach to US Tariffs?
Standing Firm Pays Off: China's diversification (net US exports down, but ASEAN up) and strategic controls show resilience; analysts say no US deal is final, as Phase One was overtaken by new threats.
Push for Self-Reliance: India should build in critical tech/minerals, insulate from shocks; reintroduce exporter schemes like interest equalisation for cheap credit and expedite customs.
Opportunities from High China Tariffs: US tariffs up to 125% on China make Indian textiles, leather, engineering, electronics competitive (India faces 10% flat during 90-day suspension); exemptions for 20% US components if declared.
Balanced Strategy: Leverage neutrality between West and BRICS; focus on Asian trade, as per NITI Aayog, to mitigate US bullying while negotiating on equal terms.
What are the Broader Economic and Strategic Implications for India?
Economic Benefits: Could attract $8,000 crore investments, create 70,000 jobs via mineral recycling; supports EV (30% adoption by 2030) and renewables, cutting import bills (e.g., Rs 1,000 crore for lithium in 2023).
Challenges: Environmental risks in mining (habitat loss, pollution); social issues in tribal areas; state-center tensions (e.g., Kerala's offshore mining opposition).
Strategic Advantages: Secures defense (rare earths in 70% modern weapons) and energy; aligns with Atmanirbhar Bharat, reducing China reliance amid global de-risking.
Recommendations: Enhance geological mapping, private partnerships, sustainability; analysts warn of unrest without community input, urging balanced growth.
© 2025 Gaining Sun. All rights reserved.