Environment

Madhav Gadgil's Enduring Impact: How His Western Ghats Report Pushed for Strong Environmental Safeguards and Met Resistance from Development Interests

January 9, 2026
Madhav GadgilWestern Ghats Ecology Expert PanelWGEEP ReportEnvironmental ConservationOpposition from StatesKasturirangan PanelBiodiversity Protection

Why in News

Renowned ecologist and environmentalist Madhav Gadgil passed away at the age of 83 after a brief illness, leading to renewed discussions on his pioneering 2011 Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP) report. This report highlighted the need for strict conservation in the ecologically fragile Western Ghats region, but it faced significant opposition from states and industries, resulting in its partial implementation through a diluted version.

Key Points

  1. Madhav Gadgil, a leading ecologist, chaired the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP) formed by the Ministry of Environment and Forests in 2010 to assess and protect the biodiversity-rich Western Ghats.
  2. The WGEEP report, submitted in 2011, classified 64% of the Western Ghats as Ecologically Sensitive Areas (ESAs) and recommended restrictions on mining, quarrying, and large-scale development to prevent environmental damage.
  3. The report proposed three levels of Ecologically Sensitive Zones (ESZ-1, ESZ-2, ESZ-3) with varying degrees of protection, emphasizing community involvement in decision-making.
  4. Strong opposition came from states like Kerala, Karnataka, Goa, and Maharashtra, citing potential impacts on local economies, livelihoods, and development projects.
  5. In response to the backlash, the government formed the Kasturirangan panel in 2012, which reduced the ESA coverage to 37% and allowed more flexibility for development activities.
  6. Gadgil's report warned of disasters like landslides and floods if unchecked development continued, predictions that have been validated by events such as the 2018 Kerala floods and 2024 Wayanad landslides.
  7. Despite rejection, the report influenced policies like the notification of ESAs in parts of the Western Ghats and ongoing debates on balancing conservation with economic growth.

Explained

What Was Madhav Gadgil's Background and Role in Environmental Conservation?

Madhav Gadgil was a prominent Indian ecologist born in 1942, known for his work in ecology, biodiversity, and sustainable development.

He founded the Centre for Ecological Sciences at the Indian Institute of Science in Bengaluru and received awards like the Padma Shri and Padma Bhushan for his contributions.

In 2010, the Ministry of Environment and Forests appointed him to head the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP) to study the region's ecology and suggest protection measures.

What Is the Western Ghats and Why Is It Important?

The Western Ghats is a mountain range along India's western coast, stretching 1,600 km through six states: Gujarat, Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Kerala.

It is a UNESCO World Heritage Site and one of the world's eight biodiversity hotspots, home to over 5,000 plant species and endangered animals like tigers and lion-tailed macaques.

The region acts as a water tower for peninsular India, feeding major rivers and supporting agriculture, but faces threats from deforestation, mining, and urbanization.

What Was the Purpose of the Gadgil Committee (WGEEP)?

The WGEEP was formed in March 2010 to evaluate the ecological status of the Western Ghats and recommend ways to conserve it while allowing sustainable development.

The panel included experts from various fields and consulted local communities, scientists, and officials over 14 months.

Its goal was to prevent environmental degradation in this fragile area, which had seen increasing landslides and floods due to human activities.

What Were the Key Recommendations of the WGEEP Report?

The report divided the Western Ghats into three Ecologically Sensitive Zones (ESZ-1, ESZ-2, ESZ-3) based on ecological vulnerability, covering about 64% of the area.

In ESZ-1 (highly sensitive), it banned large-scale mining, thermal power plants, and polluting industries, and restricted hydropower projects above 25 MW.

It promoted community-led governance, suggesting Gram Sabhas (village assemblies) have a say in development projects to ensure local benefits.

The panel recommended phasing out chemical pesticides in plantations and promoting organic farming to protect soil and water.

Why Did the Gadgil Report Face Strong Opposition?

States like Kerala and Karnataka argued the report's restrictions would halt economic growth, affecting mining, tourism, and agriculture that employ millions.

Political leaders and industries claimed it was too strict, labeling large areas as sensitive without considering local needs, leading to protests from farmers and workers.

Churches in Kerala opposed it, fearing impacts on settlements, while the report was criticized for not consulting enough stakeholders during preparation.

The central government found it impractical, leading to its rejection in favor of a more balanced approach.

What Was the Kasturirangan Panel and How Did It Differ from Gadgil's Report?

In 2012, the government set up a High-Level Working Group led by K Kasturirangan to review the Gadgil report due to widespread criticism.

The Kasturirangan panel reduced ESA coverage to 37% (from 64%), allowing more areas for development while protecting core zones.

It permitted hydropower projects and green industries in less sensitive areas, making it more acceptable to states but criticized by environmentalists for diluting protections.

The panel's recommendations were partially notified in 2013, but full implementation remains pending due to state objections.

What Has Been the Long-Term Impact of the Gadgil Report?

Though not fully adopted, it raised awareness about the Western Ghats' fragility, influencing policies like ESA notifications in 2018 for parts of the region.

Disasters like the 2018 Kerala floods and 2024 Wayanad landslides have validated Gadgil's warnings about unchecked development causing environmental harm.

It sparked debates on sustainable development, emphasizing the need for balancing ecology with economy in biodiversity hotspots.

MCQ Facts

Q1. What was the primary recommendation of the Madhav Gadgil-led WGEEP report for the Western Ghats?
A) Complete ban on all development activities
B) Classification into Ecologically Sensitive Zones with restrictions on polluting industries
C) Promotion of large-scale mining for economic growth
D) Transfer of control to state governments only
Explanation: The WGEEP report recommended dividing the Western Ghats into three levels of Ecologically Sensitive Zones (ESZs) to protect biodiversity while allowing limited sustainable activities, covering 64% of the area with varying restrictions.

Mains Question

Discuss the significance of the Madhav Gadgil report in the context of environmental conservation in the Western Ghats, analyzing the reasons for its opposition and the implications of its partial implementation for sustainable development in India.

© 2026 Gaining Sun. All rights reserved.

Visit Gaining Sun