Supreme Court Current Affairs for UPSC

The Supreme Court has reiterated that the Election Commission of India (ECI) is not the final authority to determine citizenship, and that deletion of a name from the electoral roll during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) does not result in automatic loss of citizenship status. The remarks came while hearing a plea on West Bengal, where over 33.5 lakh appeals against deletions are pending before 19 Appellate Tribunals and deleted voters are allegedly being denied welfare benefits. This article explains the SIR exercise, the Bihar SIR judgment, the ECI's powers, constitutional citizenship provisions, the Citizenship Act framework, and the appellate mechanism for UPSC Prelims and Mains.

Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla’s decision to table the inquiry report against former Allahabad High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma has reopened a major constitutional debate: can a judge avoid public accountability by resigning before the parliamentary removal process reaches its end? The issue is important for UPSC because it connects Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, Articles 124, 217 and 218, judicial independence, parliamentary scrutiny and the accountability gap in India’s higher judiciary.

The Supreme Court, in Dr. Ramesh vs State of Maharashtra, has stressed strict enforcement of the PCPNDT Act to curb sex-selection practices driven by patriarchal preference for a male child. The judgment is important for UPSC because it links gender justice, child sex ratio, reproductive technology regulation, constitutional equality and welfare legislation.